Everyone says that automated testing is expensive. Yet, at the same time, you can’t afford not to use it. You certainly should consider the costs involved. But more attention should go to what happens when your project is devoid of automation. So, today, we discuss its application in the most profit-driven area – functional automated testing.
Let’s avoid fancy term descriptions and focus on what’s important.
Functional testing means checking whether a product does what it should. For example, when a user clicks “Add to cart,” the app should include the selected item in the personal account. To check this functionality, you open the application, add a product to the cart, and see what happens. That’s how you’ll know whether this feature works.
Functional testing automation follows the same principle. But it uses tools and frameworks to streamline this process. Instead of performing the described action over and over again, you can just create a test script. After that, you’re free to run it whenever and however many times you need.
So, the entire repetition aspect is gone. This means that:
From a technical POV, functional test automation does the same thing as manual checks.
But if we’re talking team and business benefits, oh, the differences are astonishing.
Increased efficiency and speed:
Accuracy and reliability:
Enhanced test coverage:
Faster time to market:
Cost savings (surprise!):
With all that, it’s no wonder that QA functional testing is most often the first candidate for automation. These checks cover critical features and need regular validation. So, there’s no reason not to make functional tests faster and more precise. But, of course, there’s a “but.”
Automated testing strives to fully replace manual checks. And while companies rush after the benefits of automation, they forget about the unique values of manual QA. Even our god and savior, AI, can’t replace it (for now, at least).
So, we do encourage you to use automation for functional testing. But you should keep in mind that you should be careful with it. Because in the current IT era, automated and manual tests serve different purposes.
Let’s break this down.
Most often, manual functional checks are used for working with new or unstable features. You can’t apply automation to them yet. So, manual QA takes center stage here. It’s also the only way to uncover unexpected behaviors and cover extremely complex scenarios.
In these cases, manual QA offers the following perks:
Yet, these advantages come at a price:
And that’s exactly why the use of manual QA should be rather limited. Yes, it gives you what automated testing never can. But it’s also slower and comparatively more error-prone.
You can use automation for a lot more. But it works best with repetitive checks, such as regression. You can also apply it for large-scale testing, like cross-browser testing. And use it in data-driven testing and CI/CD workflows to streamline development.
Overall, functional automation testing services have many values to offer:
Of course, automated testing isn’t perfect. It also has its drawbacks:
And that’s exactly why the use of automated QA should be limited (oh, deja vu). But really. Let’s take a look at functional automated UI testing. It could perfectly handle checking the functionality of buttons, links, and forms. Now, let’s step into a user’s shoes for a second.
It’s an anything-can-happen world. And unexpected scenarios are something automation isn’t capable of dealing with. The point is, functional testing needs manual and automation testing. This mix of the two approaches is the difference between a high-quality and an alright project.
Automated functional testing services are incredibly versatile. You can apply them in tiny doses or overhaul every one of your processes. But there are some restrictions. They don’t curb automation’s effectiveness but help you avoid resource wasting and quality drops.
For example, some functional testing services can be automated only slightly. Let’s consider exploratory tests. They rely on human creativity and intuition to find odd mistakes (or features) in a product. Yet, some aspects of such randomized discovery can be automated. For instance, you can use AI tools to suggest exploration vectors, generate data, or simulate user interactions.
So, you’re automating a human-driven area to ease a QA engineer’s work, not replace it. The point is that you shouldn’t automate for the sake of automation. It should be applied only where it creates specific benefits. And yes, in some cases, functional automation testing can become a genuine hindrance.
Consider localization testing. You can automate language translation, switching, and text truncation and overlaps. But if we’re talking content appropriateness or cultural sensitivity, that’s a job for manual QA.
Overall, you’re free to automate whatever you want. Yet, you should really consider whether automation in this or that case is beneficial to your project.
From our experience, we can highlight precise characteristics that make scenarios ideal candidates for automation:
Characteristic | Description | Example |
Repetitive or high-frequency execution | Scenarios executed repeatedly during development cycles. | Regression testing for login functionality after every code update. |
High accuracy and precision requirements | Scenarios requiring exact validation of specific outputs. | Verifying tax or discount calculations in an e-commerce checkout process. |
Data-intensive scenarios | Tests needing validation against large or varied datasets. | Testing form submissions with 100+ combinations of input data. |
Predictable and rule-based behavior | Scenarios with clear workflows and expected outcomes. | Validating mandatory fields and character limits in a user registration form. |
Stable functionalities | Features unlikely to change frequently, ensuring long-term automation viability. | Checking that navigation menu links lead to the correct pages. |
Critical business workflows | Core application functionalities that must work flawlessly. | Testing an order placement workflow from cart to payment and confirmation. |
Regression-prone areas | Features or modules where bugs often occur after updates. | Verifying role-based access control after implementing new features. |
Time-consuming manual tests | Scenarios involving detailed actions that are labor-intensive manually. | Validating multi-step workflows, like onboarding or checkout processes. |
Cross-environment functional validation | Functional tests needing validation across different environments. | Ensuring the “Add to cart” button works on desktop and mobile browsers. |
With that in mind, let’s review possible uses of automated functional testing across domains. By the way, you can also treat the below sections as checklists.
As you can see, with functional test automation, the possibilities are endless. You don’t even have to automate a lot to start getting certain benefits. The key is to make sure that there are actual perks coming from your automation strategy.
Continuing with the theme of using automation correctly, we should mention its role in Agile. For most projects, automated functional testing is certainly optional. But for Agile, it’s mandatory. It’s the practice that enables fast and flexible development.
In standard projects, automation can be introduced whenever you want. And you can apply it to any degree you wish – in bits or as a complete overhaul. Automated functional testing in Agile, however, needs to begin simultaneously with the project. Without it, the entire process would fall apart.
Overall, if you’re working on an Agile project, functional automation testing isn’t something to consider. It’s something to implement right away.
Now, let’s chat about practices that advance your automated testing no matter the project. Over the years of working with diverse niches and products, our QA engineers have gathered real-world insights. So, the following tips are battle-tested.
Most importantly, remember that high-quality functional automation testing needs high-quality skills. So, we’d say that your priority should be assembling or hiring a team that can set up, support, and maintain automated tests consistently.
Functional test automation tools will be at the core of your strategy and success. And you should take their selection carefully. When choosing your helper software, the priority shouldn’t be good reviews or popularity. Instead, we recommend focusing on the following:
These four aspects should be at the core of your selection process. But, of course, you definitely should read up on the software’s reviews. And you might want to evaluate the community behind it. It could be a simple and quick way to troubleshoot any potential issues.
First, you’ll have to choose your framework. It’s basically a manual that tells you how to best apply your automation:
Overall, functional test automation frameworks provide you with guidelines and resources. And you can pick one that best suits your project.
Regarding the last framework, it seems to be the obvious choice. It includes all the good stuff from other frameworks. But you should remember that exactly because of that it’s also more difficult to work with. Plus, every project is unique. And sometimes, such an amalgamation of qualities is redundant.
So, center on what a framework can do for your product specifically. Don’t get lost in what it does overall.
Now, we’ll take a look at a few tools. They are not arranged in any particular way. These are just some options our team worked with and thinks can be useful. So, treat this list as an opportunity to window shop. Review what functional test automation tools can offer and what to expect from them.
Selenium is an open-source tool for automating functional tests for web apps. It supports multiple programming languages and works across major browsers. With its ability to execute parallel tests, cross-browser testing becomes a breeze.
Katalon Studio is an all-in-one testing platform for web, mobile, desktop, and API testing. It’s beginner-friendly with a simple interface. Yet, it also offers advanced scripting options for experts. And its pre-built keywords, detailed reporting, and seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines make automating test cases much easier.
TestComplete is designed specifically for functional UI testing. It simplifies automating functional tests by supporting over 500 UI controls and working with dynamic or complex interfaces.
Appium specializes in automating functional tests for mobile apps. It supports native, hybrid, and mobile web apps, allowing you to write tests in your preferred programming language.
Robot Framework uses a keyword-driven approach. It works well for testing web applications and other systems. With its large library ecosystem, Robot Framework is a flexible choice for functional testing needs.
Ranorex Studio is a robust tool for automating functional tests for desktop, web, and mobile apps. It offers codeless test creation via a record-and-playback feature. And it caters to advanced users with its full coding IDE. Plus, Ranorex provides reliable object recognition and thorough test coverage.
Tricentis Tosca focuses on automating functional tests using a scriptless, model-based approach. It supports a wide range of applications and ensures comprehensive functional testing. Some of its greatest features are risk-based test prioritization and advanced analytics.
Watir is a simple yet powerful tool for automating functional tests on web browsers. It interacts with web elements just like a person would, fostering user-centricity. Its integration with behavior-driven development tools makes it a great choice for functional testing.
LambdaTest is a cloud-based platform that automates functional testing for web apps. It uses Selenium to run tests across different browser and OS combinations. It’s ideal for ensuring your web app works in diverse environments and integrates with CI/CD workflows.
UFT One is a tool for automating functional tests for various app types, including enterprise-grade software. It also has AI-powered features that simplify testing complex interfaces.
And remember that you don’t really have to settle on one tool. You’re free to combine them to cover different needs. Of course, working with a singular option is much easier for your team and testing management. But if it compromises the quality of your product – it’s not worth it.
Automated functional testing is, frankly, a lot. Every aspect involved in it, from locating expertise to building a strategy, is challenging. And combining all these aspects into a coherent roadmap is a task to behold. We’ve worked on many projects. For none of them automation was easy.
But it doesn’t mean it’s not possible. Tons of apps completed their goals and created memorable products. What allowed them to do it? Skilled people. Skilled people are the nucleus of a successful app. If you have expertise on your side, then it’ll deal with whatever curveball automation can throw at you.
So, if you feel a bit overwhelmed with everything we’ve discussed so far or need a bit of help – don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.
There’s always some hesitation when it comes to outsourcing. But it’s already among the most popular business practices, especially in IT. Here’s why.
Overall, QA outsourcing follows Occam’s razor principle. It’s a simple solution for a myriad of complicated problems. And from a business POV, it gathers everything you might need in one place. From talent and tools to guidance and tiny improvements – there’s nothing you’ll be lacking.
Just remember that if you’re planning on working with a QA partner, you’ll have to choose your provider wisely. And it’s indeed not simple. Luckily, we already have a complete guide to help you with that.
Functional testing is the backbone of every project. And it would be silly not to strengthen it with automation. Faster workflows, better quality, and continuous improvement – these are only a few of the perks. Of course, the good stuff doesn’t come on its own. There’s a lot of work to do. And you ought to do it with utmost care and precision.
So, if you’re looking for experts who’ll give your project the quality it deserves – the QA Madness team is always here.
AI has made it a full circle. It was a miracle. Then it became a…
The research that shows that users prefer apps to websites is misleading. Sure, people mostly…
Quality control is obsolete. The spread of Agile, DevOps, and shift-left approach has pushed traditional…
Be honest, if your phone disappeared right now, your world would be in shambles. Data…
Teams have a love-hate relationship with Android. It’s highly customizable and has an incredibly vast…
Apple applications are easy to test. Compared to Android, that is. But when it comes…