Software bugs may indicate a lack of expertise or lower quality, but they always drive improvement. “Bug” has become a common IT term in the 20th century. Today, its usage is so mundane that the entire defect lifecycle is simplified into three stages:
But for software testing services, it’s more complicated than “squishing an insect”. Developers and QA teams need to locate, define, replicate, resolve, and revise an issue to deem it eliminated. So let’s dive into the intricacies of software bugs and their untimely deaths.
Across many definitions, the common notion is that a bug is a defect or error that leads to undesired system behavior. Why a defect OR an error? If we dive into the technicalities, there’re some distinct traits for these labels.
A bug is a general term used to describe any unexpected or unintended behavior in software. It refers to a flaw or mistake in the code that causes the software to deviate from its intended functionality.
Example: a user clicks on a “Submit” button in a web application, but the app crashes instead of processing the submission.
A defect is a specific type of bug that typically implies a failure of the software to conform to its specifications or requirements.
Example: a financial software application is supposed to calculate compound interest accurately based on user inputs, but it miscalculates the interest due to a formula error.
An error typically refers to a mistake made by a human programmer during the coding process. It can encompass syntactical errors, logical errors, or incorrect implementation of algorithms.
Example: a navigation app guides users to take the longest route to their destination due to a programming mistake in the algorithm that calculates the shortest path.
“Issue” is a broader term encompassing bugs, defects, and other problems that may arise during software development, testing, or usage. It can refer to any situation that requires attention.
Example: users of a mobile app report that the app takes an unusually long time to load certain pages. This performance slowdown is an issue.
Everyone should be aware of such differentiating nuances, just in case. But don’t rush and put a printout on your wall. Typically, QA teams go with “bugs” and avoid assigning blame by using “error” or overthinking the “true definition of an issue”.
Software bugs are an inherent and inevitable aspect of software development. Despite the efforts of skilled developers and rigorous testing methodologies, bugs can emerge for various reasons.
Software development often begins with requirements (specifications that define a product) that can change over time. As projects progress, new features may be added, existing functionalities modified, or user expectations adjusted. This dynamic nature of requirements introduces the potential for misinterpretation, overlooked scenarios, and unintended interactions.
Software development is a collaborative and creative endeavor involving human programmers who write and maintain code. Syntax errors, logical errors, and incorrect assumptions about how different parts of the software should interact can lead to unintended software behaviors.
Modern software is complex, often composed of numerous components, modules, libraries, and external APIs. As systems grow in size and complexity, it becomes challenging to anticipate all possible interactions between different parts. Changes made to one software aspect can inadvertently affect others.
Software often runs on various hardware configurations and environments, each with its own unique characteristics. Differences in operating systems, hardware components, network conditions, and user preferences can lead to software behaving illogically or encountering compatibility issues.
In today’s fast-paced software development landscape, the pressure to deliver products quickly to meet market demands is overwhelming. Time constraints can force developers to make trade-offs between thorough testing and timely delivery, potentially leading to the release of software with unresolved bugs.
The software development ecosystem constantly evolves. And new programming languages, frameworks, libraries, and tools arise regularly. Migrating software to new technologies or platforms can introduce unforeseen issues due to differences in behavior, APIs, or underlying architecture.
Effective software development requires clear communication and collaboration among team members. Miscommunication or lack of coordination can lead to misunderstandings, differing interpretations of requirements, and missed opportunities for bug prevention.
All software interacts with external services, APIs, databases, and third-party components. Changes or disruptions in these systems, such as updates to APIs or server outages, can lead to the emergence of bugs.
It is impossible to eliminate bugs entirely due to thousands of impact points. And developers and QA engineers strive to bring software to its optimal level, not the elusive and subjective perfection.
You’ve heard that QA engineers are vital in locating bugs before the product reaches the end users. But how exactly do they do this?
QA engineers are like digital detectives, meticulously examining the software’s nooks and crannies to uncover any irregularities. They employ various strategies and techniques to identify bugs, using, among the others:
Upon gaining deeper experience, QA engineers can even predict where issues are likely to occur and go straight to the high-risk areas.
“It’s not a bug. It’s a feature.” A lovely joke with a lot of truth. Distinguishing between a legitimate bug and an intended feature or user error can sometimes be challenging.
If the observed behavior contradicts the documented requirements, there’s a strong possibility of a bug causing the inconsistency.
Example: an e-commerce website supposed to display product prices in USD shows them in a different currency.
If the issue occurs consistently under specific conditions and cannot be attributed to user actions, it’s likely a bug.
Example: a video editing software crashes every time a user tries to export a video file, regardless of the content being edited.
When the software produces outcomes that are unexpected, illogical, or inconsistent with its intended behavior, it’s indicative of a bug.
Example: a button opens the wrong form or takes a user to a wrong page.
Comparing the current behavior with previous software versions can reveal anomalies that point to the presence of a bug.
Example: in an updated version of a mobile game, characters move more slowly than they did in the previous version without any intentional design changes.
Bugs are reproducible; if the same set of actions reliably triggers the issue, it’s likely a bug.
Example: a software application consistently crashes when a user attempts to upload a file larger than a certain size.
Network connectivity, hardware failures, or third-party service disruptions may also cause functional disruptions (in this case, there’s no bug).
Example: a mobile app seems unresponsive, but the cause is traced back to poor network connectivity rather than an inherent software flaw.
Error messages, log files, and console outputs can provide valuable insights into the root cause of unexpected behaviors.
Example: a web application displays an error message indicating a database connection failure when users attempt to log in.
User reports and feedback often highlight patterns of unusual behavior that may indicate the presence of a bug.
Example: several users of a software application report that it freezes when they attempt to print a document.
Accurate bug reporting is essential for developers to understand, replicate, and resolve issues effectively. When reporting a bug, QA specialists need to:
Bugs come in various forms and degrees of severity. And QA engineers need to identify and correctly assign the severity level to a bug to resolve it quickly. Consider these examples:
Identifying the severity of a bug is an essential part of the bug tracking and management process. Severity refers to a bug’s impact on the software’s functionality and user experience. Here’s how QA experts can determine the severity of a bug:
Now to another critical error characteristic – priority. It’s the order in which a bug should be addressed relative to other issues/tasks. Priority is mainly affected by a defect’s impact on the users and the available resources needed to fix it. So, for example, if there are two critical bugs, the first to be amended is determined by its priority.
When it comes to bug elimination, the process involves identifying, addressing, and rectifying issues to ensure that the software operates as intended.
Bug fixing is a collaborative effort that typically involves multiple stakeholders, including:
Detecting the need for bug fixes involves vigilant observation and data-driven analysis.
Effectively managing bug fixes requires a systematic approach. It’s a complicated procedure that goes beyond “if you see something – scream”. To do it properly, QA specialists and developers need to:
While most bugs should be addressed, there are scenarios where some might be put off, ignored, or not fixed.
The bug paradox is fascinating. Some hate defects as they denote failure. Some love them, as they also mean a job well done. Still, there’s a single certainty – mistakes help us grow. So let’s appreciate each bug and each mistake we make. They’re here to make us better.
You can’t know if anything is wrong until a problem pops up. That’s what someone…
What is the root of quality in software? A good budget, a smart strategy, customer…
We all want change sometimes. And wouldn’t it be perfect to have a person who…
You need to stress out your software. People like to avoid pressure. But it’s the…
Software, just like humans, is a social creature. It can’t exist in isolation, or it…
Mobile apps are all about ease of use and convenience. Nothing makes these two more…