Focus on Web App Manual Testing’s Critical Areas First
The critical areas we’re talking about include the unique features of your app and your product as such. If we take a look at the difference between web applications and desktop applications, you can notice the following:
Manual web app testing is similar to checking other types of applications. But there are aspects that are most important for users: navigation, responsiveness, load speed, etc. So, before you do anything else, it’s better to focus on what your customers think is paramount for this particular type of app.
- Ensure the design is functional, visually appealing, and user-friendly.
- Confirm the app works appropriately across various browsers and devices.
- Verify that it properly handles user inputs and displays clear error messages.
- Test login functionality and user permissions to ensure secure access.
- Ensure data is accurate and workflows function as expected without errors.
And, of course, you can’t forget about the core of your product – functionality, performance, usability, and others. Keep what makes your app operational and enjoyable in peak condition.
Create a Precise Plan for Web Application’s Manual Testing
As you’re well aware, manual software testing is comparatively time-consuming. And you might be tempted to rush the process to avoid messing with the deadlines. That’s something you don’t want to do. A clear roadmap lets you get to your destination quicker since you don’t have to stop every now and then to figure out where to go next.
Plus, with a defined strategy, setting up environments, allocating resources, and dividing tasks will be easier. Here’s a more generalized version of a plan for manual testing of web applications. Consider it a blueprint. Not a step-by-step guide you must follow.
Preparation Phase
First things first, – learn your product. Gather detailed requirements, review design documents, and identify core functionalities. At this stage, you should also identify your target test environments (browsers and devices). Lastly, outline objectives, scope, and methods to be used.
Test Planning
Next, branch out into the details of web application testing. Select the features that need verification. Develop comprehensive test cases that cover critical functionalities and prioritize testing areas based on impact. You can use a test matrix to organize scenarios and map out expected results for each scenario.
Initial Setup
Now, it’s time to set up the testing environment. Install the required browsers, configure developer tools, and prepare the necessary devices. Don’t forget to verify access to test accounts and prepare bug-reporting templates in advance.
Functional Testing
Begin testing by verifying the application’s fundamental operations.
- Check all links and buttons.
- Validate form submissions.
- Test input fields.
- Verify error messages.
- Confirm data processing.
- Check user authentication.
- Validate navigation paths.
Follow predefined test cases while systematically exploring user flows from start to finish. Remember that manual testing for web applications is slow. So, center on critical aspects first.
Compatibility Testing
Ensure comprehensive coverage of diverse environments. Test across different browsers and multiple device types to verify functionality and appearance. Make sure to focus on responsive design for consistent experience.
User Experience Validation
Manual testing of web-based applications shines in dealing with UX. It’ll be most productive here. So, you can take a bit more to secure an intuitive and user-friendly app. Evaluate its interface, ensuring logical structure and clear navigation. Pay attention to loading times, visual consistency, and accessibility.
Performance Testing
Assess load speeds under normal and limited network conditions. Simulate concurrent user interactions to identify potential slowdowns. And, depending on your product, test how the system handles large data sets.
Security Assessment
Since web apps rely on online services, they’re vulnerable to diverse attacks. That’s why security shouldn’t be an afterthought. Your manual tests for web app vulnerabilities should include:
- Testing login mechanisms.
- Checking input validation.
- Attempting unauthorized access.
- Verifying data protection.
- Testing password reset functionality.
Keep in mind that these are basic checks. They will offer you some protection, yet it’ll be limited. So, if you have the time and resources, advanced security testing definitely won’t hurt. We’ll talk about it in more detail later.
Documentation and Reporting
For manual testing of web apps, exhaustive documentation is indispensable. Since there’s no automated system to track and log every action, what you jot down along the way is all you have. That’s why you need an organized system for capturing and upkeeping necessary data.
- Log all test results.
- Document discovered issues.
- Capture screenshots or screen recordings for clarity.
- Write detailed, reproducible bug reports.
- Prioritize problems based on severity to streamline the resolution process.
The info you gather will also make your transition to test automation services much easier if you decide to use them.
Retesting, Regression, and Validation
After the bulk of the work is done, you ought to recheck your progress.
- Retest your fixes.
- Confirm resolved issues.
- Perform regression testing.
- Update test cases as needed.
When you confirm that everything’s secure, you can proceed with the final validation. Here, the goal is to examine conducted testing in detail. Make sure critical paths work well and verify app stability. Prepare the concluding testing summary report documenting key findings of your manual web app testing.
Ensure Adequate Test Coverage
You know that test coverage is basically how much of your web app is checked. Generally, the more, the better. But 100% coverage is often redundant. And since we’re discussing manual testing services, it’s plain impractical. To explore every millimeter of your product is to spend months on something that might not make that much of a difference.
So, your best approach here is to start with the fundamentals. Once you secure the core, you can move on to secondary, so to speak, components if time permits.
Now, let’s take a look at how to reach good coverage within your app’s nucleus.
- Functional Testing. Focus on key features and user flows, creating detailed cases to cover them properly. Prioritize business-critical areas. And ensure each step is followed precisely to avoid missing anything.
- UI Testing. Follow design guidelines, check visual elements like alignment and color, and test on different screen sizes. Use a checklist and systematically test all interface components.
- Compatibility Testing. Center on the most commonly used combinations of browsers, OS, and devices first. Then test other setups if time allows.
- Accessibility Testing. Let accessibility regulations be your guide. Check color contrasts, screen reader compatibility, and keyboard navigation. It may be helpful to work with the domain’s specialist here to speed up the testing.
Finally, look for what a user isn’t supposed to do and do it. Simulate edge cases like unusual inputs, system overloads, or network changes. Keep in mind that this sort of exploration usually has no structure. That’s why it’s beyond important to keep everything documented.
Cover Security Fundamentals
When talking about how to test web based applications manually regarding security, there are two things you should keep in mind.
- QA engineers have versatile skills. They can perform basic security checks.
- Yet, those basic security checks will give you basic protection.
Of course, we’d recommend hiring cyber resilience specialists who can handle advanced techniques. Security audits, threat modeling, penetration testing, etc., are never excessive. Your users and business will only thank you for strong protection measures.
However, it might not be an option for your manual web app testing. In that case, you need to focus on the fundamentals. And you need to make sure you have a powerful security backbone.
Authentication Vulnerabilities
- Test password complexity requirements.
- Check minimum/maximum length.
- Verify special characters, numbers, and uppercase requirements.
- Attempt weak password submissions.
- See what happens after multiple failed login attempts.
- Check for account lockout functionality.
- Test password reset process.
- Verify session management.
- Attempt login with partial credentials.
Access Control Testing
- Test unauthorized page access.
- Verify user permissions.
- Check privilege escalation risks.
- Test direct URL access to restricted pages.
- Manipulate URL parameters.
- Test for hidden form fields.
- Check session token predictability.
- Attempt login with modified cookies.
Input Validation Vulnerabilities
- Test for SQL injection points.
- Check cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
- Validate input field sanitization.
- Test with special characters.
- Attempt script injection.
- Data handling.
- Test file upload mechanisms.
- Verify file type restrictions.
- Check for path traversal vulnerabilities.
- Test upload of malicious file types.
API Vulnerability Checks
- Test unauthenticated API calls.
- Check parameter manipulation.
- Verify rate limiting.
- Test for excessive data exposure.
- Check CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) configuration.
Information Disclosure
- Review detailed error messages.
- Check for sensitive information leakage.
- Test verbose error reporting.
- Verify stack trace exposure.
When it comes to security in manual testing for web applications, it’s more efficient to have one person take care of security testing. Everyone doing a bit of everything is simpler. But it may also lead to shallow coverage. Plus, cyber resilience is a complex domain, requiring specialized expertise and plenty of time.
So, you can appoint a QA engineer with better skills in this area as your security lead. They can handle vulnerability checking on their own or team up with other engineers when needed.
Keep Exhaustive Test Documentation
We’ve explained why you need comprehensive records of everything for your manual web app testing. Now, let’s discuss the types of artifacts you should include.
Test strategy defines your overall testing approach. It outlines:
- Testing objectives.
- Testing types.
- Methodologies.
- Testing levels (unit, integration, system, etc.).
- General principles.
The strategy serves as a guiding framework, ensuring alignment with business and quality goals. It also typically remains stable across projects.
Test plan defines what will be tested, when, by whom, and with what resources. It includes:
- Test scope.
- Schedules.
- Required tools.
- Risk analysis.
- Test deliverables.
So, the strategy provides direction. And the test plan is a concrete execution roadmap that may change as the project evolves.
Test cases are step-by-step instructions for validating specific functionality. They define test scenarios, expected inputs, execution steps, and expected results.
Checklists serve as a quick reference to ensure key aspects aren’t missed. They’re less detailed. But they help maintain coverage without writing down every single detail.
Now, let’s talk about test cases specifically. Your QA engineers will mostly work with them during manual web app testing. Usually, the more detailed they are, the easier things are down the road. Simple defect tracking, better cross-functional collaboration, and valuable knowledge transfer are just a few perks of good test case documentation. So, you should also know how to achieve it.
- Be specific and detailed. Clearly outline the steps, inputs, and conditions needed to execute the test.
- Cover positive and negative scenarios. Don’t just check if the system works as expected. Test how it handles errors, invalid inputs, and edge cases.
- Include precise expected results. Define what a successful outcome looks like exactly. This makes it easy to compare actual results and quickly spot deviations.
- Document actual results during testing. Record what actually happens during execution to streamline debugging and root cause analysis.
- Provide reproducible steps. A test case should allow any tester to replicate the process exactly. If an issue is found, reproducibility ensures developers can diagnose and fix it efficiently.
- Update test cases regularly. Applications evolve, and so should test cases. Keeping them up to date prevents outdated tests from leading to false positives or missed issues.
At this point, you’re thinking that you’ll spend quite some time writing detailed documentation. And you’re correct. But it’s important to find a balance between keeping records and wasting effort. For instance, your team shouldn’t spend most of the day taking notes. Their main task is quality assurance.
So, keep your documentation organized and actually useful.
Examples of Manual Test Cases for Web Applications
A good way to save time when working with test cases is to include a few related procedures in one case. For example, say you need to see what happens when a user types in invalid symbols into their email address. Instead of creating a new test case to check how the system reacts to Latin or Cyrillic letters, special characters, or spaces, you group them under one test case.
Let’s take a look at a few examples of test cases for web applications in manual testing.
Test Case 1: User Registration Functionality
Test Case ID: TC001
Title: Verify User Registration Process
Priority: High
Preconditions:
- Web application is accessible
- Registration page is loading correctly
- No existing account with test email
Test Steps:
1. Navigate to registration page
2. Verify all registration fields are visible
- First Name
- Last Name
- Email
- Password
- Confirm Password
3. Enter valid data in all fields
- First Name: “John”
- Last Name: “Doe”
- Email: “[email protected]”
- Password: “StrongPass123!”
- Confirm Password: “StrongPass123!”
4. Click “Register” button
5. Verify successful registration
- Check for confirmation message
- Verify email verification link (if applicable)
Expected Results:
- Successful user account creation
- Confirmation message displayed
- Verification email sent (if configured)”
Actual Results: To be filled during testing
Status: Pass/Fail
Validation Criteria:
- All fields accept appropriate input
- Password meets complexity requirements
- No duplicate registrations allowed
- Clear error messages for invalid inputs
Test Case 2: Login Functionality with Invalid Credentials
Test Case ID: TC002
Title: Validate Login Mechanism with Invalid Credentials
Priority: High
Preconditions:
Web application login page is accessible
Test user account exists
Test Scenarios:
1. Empty Credentials
- Leave both username and password fields blank
- Click “Login”
- Expected: Error message displayed
2. Invalid Email Format
- Enter: “invalidemail”
- Enter valid password
- Expected: Email format error message
3. Incorrect Password
- Enter registered email
- Enter incorrect password
- Expected: “Invalid credentials” error
- Verify login attempt is blocked
4. Non-existent User
- Enter non-registered email
- Enter any password
- Expected: “User not found” error
Validation Points:
- Error messages are clear and specific
- No unauthorized access
- Proper input validation
- Secure error handling
Test Case 3: Shopping Cart Functionality
Test Case ID: TC003
Title: Verify End-to-End Product Purchase Flow
Priority: Critical
Preconditions:
- User is registered and logged in
- Products are available in catalog
- Payment gateway is configured
Detailed Test Steps:
1. Browse product catalog
2. Select multiple products
3. Add products to cart
- Verify correct product added
- Check quantity adjustment
4. Navigate to cart
- Verify product details
- Check total price calculation
5. Proceed to checkout
- Enter shipping information
- Select shipping method
6. Payment process
- Enter valid payment details
- Confirm order
7. Order Confirmation
- Check order summary
- Verify confirmation email
- Check order tracking option
Expected Results:
- Smooth product selection
- Accurate price calculations
- Successful order placement
- Immediate order confirmation
- Email notification received
Additional Validation:
- Stock reduction after purchase
- Order tracking functionality
- Payment gateway integration
Test Case 4: Password Reset Functionality
Test Case ID: TC004
Title: Validate Password Reset Mechanism
Priority: High
Preconditions:
- Registered user account exists
- Email service is operational
Test Scenarios:
1. Initiate Password Reset
- Click “Forgot Password”
- Enter registered email
- Verify reset link generation
2. Reset Link Validation
- Check email received
- Verify link is time-sensitive
- Test link expiration
3. Password Reset Process
- Enter new password
- Confirm password
- Validate password complexity
- Successful reset confirmation
Security Checks:
- One-time use reset link
- Secure link transmission
- Password complexity enforcement
- Previous password prevention
Overall, there are multiple ways to structure your test cases. You can pick one format that suits your project or mix and match them as needed. Just make sure the team is aware of available templates so no one gets confused.
Carefully Select Manual Testing Tools for Web Applications
When choosing a tool, you shouldn’t just type in “What are some tools for manually testing mobile web apps” and settle on the most popular option. Reviews and ratings are valuable. They might offer you some insight into the tool. But you always need to review it in the context of your project. So, consider these aspects during your selection:
- Can the tool properly cover your testing needs in terms of features, setup, and maintainability?
- How well does the tool integrate with your existing workflows and processes?
- Is the tool capable of scaling as your project evolves?
- How easy is it for your team to work with the tool and what’s its learning curve?
- Does the tool offer decent reporting capabilities?
And if you’re considering working with free or open-source tools, you should assess available support and community. If you have questions or issues, there’s rarely an official source to turn to for help. So, be mindful of what you can do when something goes wrong.
Let’s review some types of tools you’re going to need for manually testing web apps.
- Browser developer tools are used to inspect and debug your product. They let you examine the DOM, troubleshoot layout issues, monitor network activity, and test responsive design.
- Screen recording software allows you to capture the testing process via videos. You can document and report bugs, interactions, or app behaviors, offering visual evidence of issues.
- Cross-browser testing platforms focus on checking how the app operates across different browsers and devices.
- Performance monitoring tools track and evaluate the app’s performance, including load times, responsiveness, and resource consumption.
- Accessibility testing tools evaluate how accessible your app is. They check for compliance with accessibility standards, such as color contrast, screen reader compatibility, and keyboard navigation.
- Bug tracking software helps log, prioritize, and track bugs or issues discovered during testing. It makes managing and monitoring progress easier and more structured.
Keep in mind that your manual testing for web applications doesn’t have to be limited to one tool. You can use a few of them to cover more of your needs or balance your budget.
To Sum Up
These are the key insights our team has gathered after over a decade of working with diverse projects. We can surely say that they work. And they work for pretty much any app. We understand that staying on budget is essential. But so is quality. And it should never be compromised. So, if you’re looking for a solution that’s fair-priced and lets you create a product of outstanding value – we’re here to help.
Outsource testing to certified QA specialists
Contact us