QA MadnessBlog Manual vs Automated Testing: Which One Does Your Startup Need?
Manual vs Automated Testing: Which One Does Your Startup Need?
Reading Time: 6minutes
The present business environment is more than challenging for startups. Let’s look at some numbers. The deal value has been declining since Q1 2022, and Q3 2023 was the second-lowest since then. The drop in funding is down 44-54% across all stages.
With a recession in progress, startup teams are forced to operate with lower investments and seek solutions for expense optimization. The result is rising competition between new products across all niches. Now, founders need to invest more effort in product development at all levels – from formulating business tasks to quality assurance and interaction with users.
The way the software looks, works, and feels affects the decisions of investors and future users. When a product passes the MVP stage, and its functionality starts expanding, quality becomes more critical, while mistakes get more probable and expensive. Quality assurance with its automated testing services and software manual testing services becomes critical.
So, how to arrange QA at this stage to make quality work for you? It is necessary to determine the testing needs of the product at its current stage. Among other things, you need to decide what to test manually, what to cover with autotests, and whether to start implementing automation right away.
Manual and Automated Testing in a Nutshell
In manual testing, a QA engineer estimates software manually and visually by interacting with it directly. They check everything using their hands, eyes, and minds. In automated testing, QA engineers set up frameworks and write scripts to automate user actions. The testing runs automatically after it is set up.
Both have the same goal: detect bugs, errors, issues, anomalies, etc. – any deviations from what the team considers “normal” or what has been stated as “normal” in the requirements. From a technical viewpoint, the difference between manual and automated testing lies in using specific tools. In practice, you need to know the cases and conditions for applying each.
Manual testing comes first and sets the background for automation. It works best for checking new features, test cases that aren’t precisely algorithm-based, and tasks that require cognitive abilities.
Automated testing is perfect for repetitive, complicated, and time-consuming tasks as it comes with higher accuracy and faster test execution. Yet, it is inefficient for new functionalities. If something changes in code, QA engineers need to alter the test scripts covering it. And it’s just extra work.
Manual Testing
Automated Testing
Expediency
New products and features, small functionalities, one-time tasks
QA engineers write scripts and set up the framework; a computer runs the tests
Accuracy
Lower accuracy because of the human factor
Higher accuracy as it relies on computer-based processes and algorithms
Reusability
Documentation is reusable, there is no need to change it every time. Still, it is a manual repetition of the same cases over and over again
Can be rerun without intervention multiple times
Speed
Takes more time to complete as it is entirely carried out by human software testers
Is faster as tests can run in parallel in different environments, on different devices and browsers, run unintended during off-work hours
Coverage
Suitable for all cases and functionalities
Suitable only for stable functionalities and cases where it is possible to formulate a clear pass/fail result
Maintenance
Easier to maintain, though QA engineers need to review and update checklists and/or test cases
More difficult to maintain as automation requires constant script updates based on test scope changes and tool updates
Expertise
Requires knowledge of testing theory and, preferably, domain knowledge of the industry
Requires knowledge of software testing theory, domain knowledge of the industry (preferably), and programming languages
Setup
Easier to start, suitable for all stages of the development
Requires manual test cases as the basis for scripts; initial setup is more time-consuming
Cost
Cheaper to set up but potentially gets more expensive – if the scope of work grows and functionality becomes larger and more complex
More expensive to set up but more cost-efficient in the long run
When Does a Startup Need Manual Testing?
A startup always needs manual testing at the early stages of quality assurance. The coverage is defined based on available time and budget. It can be business-critical functionality, everything a QA engineer can think of, or something in-between – if, for example, compatibility (testing on a large variety of devices), accessibility (testing the suitability for people with disabilities), or some other aspect is crucial for a company.
Here is a short list of cases when manual testing is necessary:
At the initial stage of product development, when there are many code changes.
Every time software developers add new features to the product.
After small changes and quick fixes, when testing the selected functionalities is enough.
During one-time checks that often fall under exploratory and ad hoc testing.
When human intervention is necessary: to check visual consistency, basic usability, logic, only selected features or requirements, etc.
Manual testing is a better option for small projects with narrow functionality, a finite scope of features, and only occasional updates.
When Does a Startup Need Automated Testing
The scope of work and number of bugs increase along with the number of code lines. At some point, you will need to hire more manual QA engineers or automate a part of the processes.
With automated testing, the team adopts broader test coverage, effective hotfixes, shorter release cycles, simpler report generation, and more time for manual-only activities. However, there are specific scenarios that justify automation in a startup:
You plan to add new features in the future and scale. In this case, automating smoke and regression testing will save time and shorten a sprint cycle.
Human error can be critical for business results. Let’s suppose there are numerous similar inputs with different outputs. Testing such a product can become tedious. When checked manually, the tiniest mistake affects software accuracy and business performance.
Testing certain features manually is time-consuming. For example, booking systems, medical software, etc., may need to deal with long codes consisting of numbers and letters. Entering this input data manually usually takes a lot of time and tends to slow down the process significantly.
Adopting automated testing is also cost-efficient in the long run. When relevant, it guarantees higher accuracy, human factor elimination, and faster turnaround.
Manual or Automated – How to Decide?
The initial checkup cannot be automated per se. The first encounter lets a QA specialist understand the functionality. Without going through the features manually, a QA engineer won’t be able to define the scope for automation. Besides, even the best product is unstable in the early stages.
Also, some tasks and types of testing can be performed only manually. For example, exploratory and ad-hoc testing that doesn’t rely on pre-written test cases belongs here. Visual UI testing and usability testing also require the human eye and experience.
Finally, manual testing works best for small projects, products with dynamic functionality and frequently changing requirements, and checking small changes on the go.
So, what’s left to automate? It’s repeated checks for critical features or large parts of functionality. Simply put, when the team feels that there’s too much work, and some test suits are applied every other sprint, it’s time to discuss automation.
How to Benefit from Both: The QA Madness Team’s Experience
The key is determining what the software needs at its current stage and adjusting the strategy accordingly as the product evolves. Several options may be suitable:
Implementing test automation starting from the second sprint, after one iteration of manual testing.
Hiring an AQA engineer only to set up the automation and run the scripts independently later.
Waiting until the team develops a big chunk of the functionality so that the automation is more cost-efficient to set up.
Regardless of your decision, it’s best to discuss the viability of automated testing at the specific stage with an expert.
From our experience, the two most frequent scenarios are:
Hiring a single person to run manual and automated testing.
Long-term cooperation with organic scaling of the QA process.
Hiring an Expert in Manual & Automated Testing
We’ve been practicing this solution for a few years now. It works best for:
Small projects with a clearly defined scope of tasks.
Combination of repeated tasks and under-development functionality.
For example, NADUVI – a multi-brand online platform for interior design products – was interested in having one QA engineer for manual and automated tasks. Assigning one to work on the project helped uncover the bottlenecks in the QA process and adjust it to the project’s needs.
The cooperation with some of our biggest clients started shortly after they launched their products. The QA team supported the scaling and suggested adjustments when they were necessary.
In this case, if automated testing sounds attractive at the early stages of product development, there’s a QA expert around who can help you decide whether it is already time to implement automation.
To Sum Up
Whether to focus on manual or automated testing depends on the state of your product at the moment you are reading this. As you already know, manual testing always comes first. It is the basis of quality assurance for any software. Test automation is a good way to facilitate and optimize the work, leaving fewer tasks for manual inspection.
So, the challenge is finding QA specialists to help you balance manual and automated testing and adjust the QA process as your product evolves. It can be a freelancer, an in-house team member, an outsourced expert, or a combination of different models.
In QA Madness, we don’t believe in automation for the sake of automation. The team takes a personal approach to each client and each product to determine and set up what would work best for them. We’ll be glad to learn more about your product and help you refine its quality.
In honor of Women's Day, we would like to pay tribute to the women in Information Technology. Modern IT world viewed only as "a boy's thing". But this is not totally true. A lot of computing pioneers — the people who programmed the first digital computers — were women. Now, less than 25% of the IT workforce are women, but in the software testing sector the percentage filled by women is now approaching 50%. Women’s typical cognitive differences make them invaluable to IT teams. Let's pay attention to the history. One might believe that women did not play an important role in the beginnings of computer science, but in reality they have made significant contributions in many areas, starting from the early days. In any discussion of the pioneers in computing, the names of two visionaries immediately come to mind:
Augusta Ada Byron Lovelace (1815 – 1852). She is ...
First of all, what is “software bug”? Everyone understands that it isn’t an insect ( well, not anymore, anyway :-) ). According to Wikipedia: software bug is an error, flaw, failure, or fault in a computer program or system that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected result, or to behave in unintended ways.” Some bugs can be detected easily during development. But some bugs might be found late in the development process. There have been many attempts to classify the bugs. Most of these represent the general classification which is valid in the cycle of software development and evolution. The classification scheme given in Orthogonal Defect Classification defines eight categories of defects as assignment, checking, algorithm, interface, timing/serial, function documentation, and build/pack/merge. Most everything in such classification understandable, useful and boring. But, sometimes, going through a code, you may face a dark horse from the bug's world. There are ...
Software testing is the process of evaluation a software item to detect differences between given input and expected output. Software testing is a process that should be done during the development process. In other words, software testing is a verification and validation process.
This article is devoted to highlighting the most popular software testing tools nowadays.
Performance Testing Tools:
Here are some important tools to test the performance, load and stress of the website/application. These tools ensure that your website/application will run under high performance and less load & stress.
Apache JMeter is a 100% pure Java desktop application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance...
What is your association with term "superhero"? For many of you, the image of superhero will remind you about the feeling of reliability and protection. Each superhero stands against the evil force by day and night. I'll reveal one amazing secret to you today... At the spare time, between fights against crime, brave superheroes protect your websites and apps! Yes, superheroes working as testers for a long time! Think about it... They are hidden in the shadows. No rest, no peace, no sleep until they capture a villain and hand them over to the authorities. They are the Keepers of your reputation in the Digital World! Nevertheless, who are they? Let the Secret be revealed!
Who: Captain America
How to find out: supercorrect, strict, the true patriot. His mind is only about the "quality, quality, quality", and is better not to joke with him. Havi...
Magento, as one of the leading eCommerce platforms, is used to create the most successful and high-quality online stores. The great variety of eCommerce websites, make quite serious competition on the market and the main point that will help you to be on the Toplist is Quality. Without proper testing, "sketchy" websites may face a number of challenges after launch. Based on our experience, we have compiled a list of the most "popular" bugs that we faced during Magento testing. Here are the most common of them:
Bug #1: You can’t rate the product or write a review for it.
It’s not the most critical bug, but it still can bugs people. The lack of opportunities to share their experiences with others can bring customers to the idea that you don't want to have truthful reviews on the website, so this may push for the idea that something is wrong with your product. ...
1. Your Store Policies Are Not Clear or Are Too Restrictive
Buying online is convenient, but people look for brick and mortar style assurance, too. They want to know they can easily return products or contact someone about trouble with your service.
2. Not Flexible Shipping Options
Free shipping is big with shoppers, and is quickly becoming an industry standard. Maybe this isn’t within your budget, but you may be able to shift some numbers around to make it fly. Testing will reveal what works best for you. Just make sure customers are aware of your free shipping option if you offer it.
3. Not Mobile Friendly
If you haven’t overhauled your design in the past two years, here’s your likely problem. Studies show that mobile shoppers acco...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.