Why do you test your software? To find issues, advance quality, and improve user experience – all are valid answers. But testing isn’t just a product refinement tool. Software testing services can shrink development costs, be a part of your scalability strategy, drive innovation, and more.
Today, we’ll talk about the uses of QA that go outside app quality. We’ll dissect the most loved “forms” of quality assurance to see how you can fully benefit from them.
Briefly, outsourced testing services presuppose hiring an external specialist to do a job. For example, you can partner with an independent vendor, like a QA company, or experts, like testing freelancers.
When you hire QA engineers via the outsourcing model, you set the terms and conditions together:
For instance, at QA Madness, we approve all the details with our clients before the work starts. This way, we can ensure that our specialists fit your needs and can deliver the results you want (or better). We also take responsibility for the hires’ management, communication, and productivity.
Overall, outsourced QA testing services are a proven method of reliably delivering quality. And as per Deloitte, nearly 80% of executives depend on this practice. Now, let’s talk about why it’s so popular.
The outsourced software testing market is valued at over $30 billion as of 2022. And for good reasons. Normally, companies prefer to use this model to save costs without compromising quality and results. But there are many more advantages. For instance, Alibaba and PayPal used outsourcing to find skills scarce in their location. And the perks don’t end there.
Outsourcing gives you access to a pool of professionals with skills across various domains. Whether you need outsourced mobile testing, automated software testing services, or pros in highly complicated software like ERPs, you can find anything. You’re not limited to your in-house team. Or your location, for that matter. You can tap into the global expertise to locate exceptional candidates.
You can also easily adjust the size of your team by hiring people on demand. For example, if you work with top software testing companies, you can scale up quickly during peak development phases or shrink the crew during slower periods. And you don’t have to worry about the overhead costs of hiring and training permanent staff. You can request as many or as few experts as you like for as long as you like.
Outsourced QA helps you save money, too. For instance, the average yearly salary of a QA engineer in the USA is around $90,000. While, say, in Italy, it’s approximately €30,000. But it’s not only wage-related cost reduction.
You can also cut back on recruiting, training, and maintaining an in-house team. When you work with an outsourced software testing company, you eliminate expenses associated with salaries, benefits, infrastructure, and tools. Your QA partner takes care of all of that.
External expertise can speed up your SDLC. Off-shore outsourced teams often work during your off-work hours due to different time zones, enabling continuous testing and faster issue resolution.
For example, when your nine-to-five has finished, the morning has just begun somewhere else. And by the time you get to work the next day, you have an already tested build and can move on. That’s why you shouldn’t dismiss outsourced QA testing from foreign providers.
Another pro of working with an outsourced testing vendor is their readiness. They stay updated with industry trends and innovations to deliver productive services for you. That means that they have access to a wide range of advanced tools, technologies, and frameworks. Even the good old manual testing services will be on another level.
When some of your team’s tasks are covered by other agents, you can focus your crew on highly valuable duties. For example, they can dedicate their time fully to product development, innovation, and strategic planning. And you don’t miss out on anything as testing is handled by other experts.
Something not everyone realizes is that outsourced specialists can transform your project in unexpected ways. They offer an unbiased, objective point of view on your product. This fresh perspective can help identify issues the in-house team may overlook due to being too engrossed in your app.
Outsourced testing can accelerate innovation as well. It can help you adopt new practices, methodologies, and technologies without spending time and money on training and onboarding. You can simply hire the exact expert you need.
There’s no good without the bad. And outsourced QA isn’t an exception. To be prepared, you should also consider the risks of working with external personnel and companies.
Such troubles primarily arise from working with a subpar QA company. That’s why it’s beyond important to choose your provider diligently. QA Madness has created a guide on selecting and working with outsourced testing services. If you want to secure productive collaboration with your external expertise partner, give it a read.
When it comes to deciding whether you need outsourced testing services, there are some things to consider.
If you’re satisfied with your in-house team’s work – great, no need for a QA provider. If you feel like you could do better – request an audit from experts. They’ll offer an independent evaluation of your testing process and help you understand its state. But do be aware of vendors who push extra services onto you just because.
And if you’re confident your project needs an upgrade – plenty of top-notch QA companies are happy to help. There are no definitive traits your project has to have to “qualify” for outsourced expertise. But from our practice, we’ve noticed some cases where a collaboration with a testing vendor will certainly be of value.
Outsourced testing is not limited to particular types of testing or industry. It can support a wide range of needs for any sector. That’s the beauty of outsourcing – you will always find just what you need.
Crowdsourced app testing means presenting a task to a group of QA engineers. These specialists can be freelancers and come from specialized companies or crowdsourced testing platforms. So, you’re not exactly hiring people. You offer them a task with a reward for completion.
Crowdsourced QA testing is typically challenge-based. If a person solves this challenge, they get either money or recognition. Here’s a brief overview of how this might work:
Overall, crowdsourced testing services are very much like bug hunting. They allow you to rely on the diversity of the community and the many perspectives that come from it.
Crowdsourced application testing is a relatively young practice. It established itself in the early 2000s and has been gaining popularity ever since. In 2023, the crowdsourced testing market size was valued at around $3 billion. So, the sector is definitely going strong. And even giants like Meta, Netflix, and Microsoft rely on it.
Now, let’s take a look at how the crowdsourced testing industry is useful.
Anyone can be a part of crowdsourced testing companies and platforms. For you, this means being able to get insights from people from all walks of life. Such QA engineers have different backgrounds, locations, and demographics. You can use this diversity to uncover unique issues that might be missed by a homogenous in-house team.
Crowdsourced QA testing involves freelancers or specialists paid on a per-bug or hourly basis. Thus, it can be more affordable than maintaining a full-time QA crew. Plus, crowdsourced testing reviews can also serve as payment for services in some cases. You might not even need to spend money.
With crowdsourced testing, a large number of people can work simultaneously on your task. For example, when Avast, one of the largest internet security companies, used the crowdsourcing model, about 230 million people participated in the initiative. So many QA engineers centered on your app translate to quick, continuous feedback.
Crowdsourced experts use their own devices, networks, and environments. This means that the results you get from them are authentic, representing actual user conditions. Crowdsourced usability testing might be especially helpful for getting a real-life evaluation of your product. You can identify issues that may only appear in specific settings.
Crowdsourced testing offers flexibility in scaling the testing effort. For example, when you’re at the starting stages of your SDLC, you might need lots of hands on deck. And as you move on to minor tweaks instead of big updates, a few specialists on your side will be enough. This transition can work well with crowdsourced UX testing.
Finally, what we see as the most impressive advantage of crowdsourcing is the surprise factor. You can never know what QA engineers might find. A person from thousands of miles away may be testing on their microwave oven and find something that’ll make your product ten times better.
Crowdsourced application security testing, for instance, takes advantage of this phenomenon. People can use whatever possible to evaluate your app. And the possibilities of what they may uncover are endless as well.
The unique nature of crowdsourcing comes with unique cons. So, before you jump on this marvelous practice, consider what might go wrong.
Also, you should remember that crowdsourcing is usually a short-term venture. You can’t rely on people to test your entire app on a bug bounty basis.
Unlike outsourcing, crowdsourced QA is most useful in particular scenarios. For example, crowdsourced application security testing will work perfectly if you want to find ethical hackers. On the other hand, if your project is highly confidential, giving access to a bunch of people isn’t the best idea.
Let’s take a look at cases where you can reliably use crowdsourcing.
Generally, crowdsourcing involves more risks. So, you might want to look into companies that specialize in this practice. In other words, you can outsource crowdsourced testing services (now that’s a tongue twister).
Interestingly enough, the success of both outsourcing and crowdsourcing depends on your choice of a provider. Hence, you shouldn’t bank on either of these methods. You should trust your team to find the right vendor.
Now that we’re on the same page about what this QA duo is, let’s bring them in closer. We’ll compare outsourcing and crowdsourcing based on factors that’ll help you better understand which approach is better for you.
Project Aspects | Outsourced Testing | Crowdsourced Testing |
Scope and Complexity | Suitable for complex, specialized, or large-scale projects that require in-depth knowledge and expertise. | Best for simpler, dynamic tasks that benefit from diverse perspectives and quick feedback. |
Management | Managed by the outsourcing provider with clear processes, timelines, and reporting standards. | Less structured management, often requiring more internal coordination to handle multiple testers and their outputs. |
Expertise | Offers access to a dedicated team with specific domain knowledge and experience. | Varies greatly; testers have diverse backgrounds, and expertise levels can be inconsistent. |
Cost Implications | Typically higher initial costs due to the dedicated team, but predictable and can be negotiated. | Generally lower upfront costs but can become unpredictable depending on the volume of feedback or bugs reported. |
Speed | Can be slower initially due to onboarding and setup, but stable over time with consistent team output. | Faster for quick iterations and gathering broad feedback from a large number of testers in a short time. |
Software Specifics | Suitable for any type of software, especially those with complex or specific requirements. | Best for consumer-facing software, mobile apps, and services requiring diverse device and environment testing. |
Geographic Reach | Limited to the locations of the outsourced team or company. | Global reach with testers from diverse locations, ensuring a wide range of environmental and user conditions. |
Project Stage | Effective at any stage of the project, especially during development and final validation. | Most useful during later stages like beta testing, UAT, or for post-launch feedback. |
Regional Relevance | Can focus on specific regions depending on the outsourced team’s location and capabilities. | Ideal for testing localization and regional differences due to the varied geographical locations of testers. |
Team Integrations | Easier to integrate into internal processes due to a dedicated team and clearer communication channels. | Less integrated; communication can be challenging due to the decentralized nature of testers. |
Feedback and Quality | More consistent and reliable due to dedicated, experienced testers following standard processes. | Feedback quality can vary; there is a risk of inconsistent results due to varying tester expertise. |
Long-Term Cooperation | Suitable for long-term partnerships, providing continuity, deep product knowledge, and stable outputs. | Generally short-term; testers may change frequently, leading to less continuity and product familiarity. |
If you’re not quite sure whether you need crowdsourced or outsourced testing, you can use this brief questionnaire to get a general direction.
Consider outsourced testing services if you answer “yes” to all or most of these questions:
Consider crowdsourced testing services if you answer “yes” to all or most of these questions.
If you’re torn between the benefits of outsourcing and crowdsourcing, no worries. You can use both.
Sometimes, blending crowdsourcing and outsourcing can be the ideal solution. Granted, you’ll have to manage not one but two processes now. But no one’s gonna stop you. Just make sure you can handle it.
Start with outsourced testing to cover detailed and specialized testing needs. This could include complex scenarios like security assessments, compliance checks, and performance testing. Once the core features and functionalities are solid, shift to crowdsourced testing for diverse user feedback. Bug bounties can also be great for handling simpler tasks.
Briefly, use outsourced QA testing for important and intricate tasks and crowdsourcing for easier, dynamic stuff.
To demonstrate how you can balance between the two, consider this example.
Use outsourced testing for:
And switch to crowdsourcing for:
Basically, you can either use crowdsourcing and outsourcing for the same stuff, just at different levels. Or you can dedicate specific duties to either option.
To productively use both practices, you’ll need to do some work as well (likely a lot of work). We can’t, with a clear conscience, tell you what to do, as we don’t know your project or needs. It might lead you astray or introduce confusion. But these general tips from our QA engineers should help.
Overall, if you decide to mix outsourcing and crowdsourcing, your team will assume orchestrating roles. And it might be a bit distracting. So, before using this hybrid approach, consult with your crew on whether they are comfortable with handling these management duties.
Outsourced and crowdsourced testing are remarkably different. But they’re united by a common goal – helping you achieve better results. And in the end, whether you need proven expertise or diverse skills and perspectives doesn’t matter too much.
What matters is that you’ve decided to take a step toward refined quality. If you know what you want, you’ll definitely find a way to achieve that. And we’ll be here to help you do it.
Quality control is obsolete. The spread of Agile, DevOps, and shift-left approach has pushed traditional…
Be honest, if your phone disappeared right now, your world would be in shambles. Data…
Teams have a love-hate relationship with Android. It’s highly customizable and has an incredibly vast…
Apple applications are easy to test. Compared to Android, that is. But when it comes…
Result-driven QA isn’t always about planning and strategizing. Sometimes, the best thing for your product…
A flimsy UI doesn’t lead to customer frustration, negative reviews, and high churn. When people…