As a part of a taxi app project, you are well aware of the amount of resources needed to build such a product. Without diving into technical details, remember:
Clearly, there is much to pay attention to when creating taxi apps. That’s why software testing services are essential for the product’s proper functioning. While developers, project managers, business analysts, etc., are paramount for the overall quality of the product, every listed position would need to do the work outside of their duties and expertise.
In this article, we’ll share practical insights regarding mobile testing services. It will shed some light on the technical particularities of the process and can become a guide for teams forced to test their apps without relying on professional QA for some reason – for even superficial testing is better than no testing at all.
To cover all the particulars of software testing, we would need one to four years (the average study timeline for QA engineers), so let’s focus on the essentials.
It verifies that the basic functionality of the application is working as expected. When it comes to taxi apps, you can check the following via smoke testing:
It ensures that the user interface of the application is functioning correctly. For taxi apps, it focuses on:
It validates the application programming interface’s requests and responses. Simply put, it investigates how well your app communicates with other systems, platforms, programs, and so on. Here, you can:
It evaluates how the app runs in different digital environments, including hardware, operating systems, browsers, etc. Meaning that you should test:
It assesses whether the app can handle a large number of users and requests. In other words, you will need to center on:
It appraises your app’s defense systems, locates vulnerabilities, and defines potential threats and how to mitigate them. Since taxi apps work with sensitive user data, such as addresses, routes, and payment info, security testing is critical. For example, it can:
It checks the application wholly by simulating the user journey. For instance, from the moment the user signs up and to the finalized payment, i.e., from start to finish. So, for taxi apps, this testing could cover:
It prioritizes affirming that implemented changes did not cause any new issues or unexpected behavior. Say you have added a fully novel function or needed to slightly tweak the info icon. Even small alterations can lead to significant (often unforeseen) shifts in the app. Hence, you will need to:
It determines whether the application meets the requirements and expectations of consumers, stakeholders, managers, and other users. Specifically, this testing measures the level to which your app is satisfactory for:
It evaluates how the app conforms to accessibility standards. Briefly, you need to consider small adjustments that would make your product more comfortable for people with disabilities and individuals working in distracting/challenging conditions. For instance:
While distinct in approaches, they try to break the testing process or freely browse the app to find unexpected/unforeseen bugs, respectively. Those carrying out these tests depend on prior experience and creativity to locate errors. Specifically, you could check:
And do not forget about user experience testing, which evaluates how easy and enjoyable it is for users to interact with your product. After all, it is the overall experience your customers receive that allows them to decide whether to stay or leave.
Compared to test cases, use cases, and test scripts, test scenarios are an easier way of tracking what should be checked. Simply put, they are objectives that users need to complete to utilize your app. All four options require considerable expertise, yet test scenarios could be the optimal decision when testing without a professional QA team.
Let’s break down the first possible test scenario to better grasp this technique.
While these questions may appear identical in their results, the user cannot register, even tiny deviations and differences can produce curious events, errors, and crashes.
As you can see, although test scenarios are written in simple language that any employee could understand, they necessitate ample thinking. Denoting that the person tasked with testing still needs at least some level of proficiency and skills to complete the tests effectively.
Now, we move on to other crucial test scenarios you should review to secure a stable taxi app.
These are only a few examples of test scenarios for taxi apps you could include. For exhaustive testing guidelines, your testing team will need to be on personal terms with the functionality, requirements, business goals, target audience, etc., of the app.
You may have noticed that most of the test scenarios have a certain duality to them, e.g., registering with in/valid data. This phenomenon is called positive/negative testing.
Positive testing involves testing the software using valid inputs and expected outputs to ensure that the software is functioning as intended.
For example, to create a user name, customers must use only letters. Thus, during testing, you need to type in just that and confirm that the app reacts appropriately.
In contrast, negative testing involves intentionally testing the software using invalid or unexpected inputs to determine how it responds to such scenarios.
Here, the testing procedure purposely strays away from the predicted inputs. Hence, at the time of testing, you type in letters with numbers, just numbers, symbols, etc., to see whether the app displays errors, explanation messages, or crashes.
The combination of positive and negative testing leads to a robust and secure product that can handle all possible anomalies.
Here, we will explore some positive test cases for taxi apps to serve as a guide for understanding this concept and how it works.
ID: TC-1
Summary: Check that a user can book a taxi.
Pre-conditions:
Steps:
Expected result: The app displays a success message. A user gets ride details: information about the car, driver’s location and arrival time, traffic jams, and expected arrival time.
ID: TC-2
Summary: Check if a user can select a specific driver.
Pre-conditions:
Steps:
Expected result: The user can select a specific driver from the list.
And here are a few potential negative test cases for taxi apps you might use.
ID: TC-3
Summary: Check if the app doesn’t allow booking with an invalid pick-up location.
Pre-conditions:
Steps:
Expected result: The app displays an error message indicating that the pick-up location is invalid.
ID: TC-4
Summary: Check if the app rejects booking with invalid card data.
Pre-conditions:
Steps:
Expected result: The app displays an error message indicating that the payment has failed.
Developers, PMs, BAs, etc., can certainly contribute to testing efforts. But they may not have the same level of expertise or focus on testing as dedicated QA professionals. To ensure that every necessity of your app is fully covered, you should allow each part of your team to take care of aspects they are qualified for.
Quality control is obsolete. The spread of Agile, DevOps, and shift-left approach has pushed traditional…
Be honest, if your phone disappeared right now, your world would be in shambles. Data…
Teams have a love-hate relationship with Android. It’s highly customizable and has an incredibly vast…
Apple applications are easy to test. Compared to Android, that is. But when it comes…
Result-driven QA isn’t always about planning and strategizing. Sometimes, the best thing for your product…
A flimsy UI doesn’t lead to customer frustration, negative reviews, and high churn. When people…