Did you know there are over five million mobile applications? Now that’s tough competition. But not for the reasons you think. Half of all apps will be gone from users’ phones within a month. And half of those – within a day.
So, you shouldn’t worry about other products stealing your thunder. You should, however, about making a project that people will want to stick with. And the ultimate council, your consumers, are really tough judges.
But we got you. Our entire team summarized their expertise and real experience to deliver you this apex guide on how to do mobile app testing.
Before discussing how to test an app in a meaningful way, we need some context. It’ll help you better understand why we recommend what we recommend. It’ll help you grasp the technical side of Mobile Application Testing Services. And it’ll help you gradually digest all the data.
So, first, mobile app testing types. Native, hybrid, and progressive applications have their differences. Thus, your testing needs to adapt to them. Because that’s how you get the best results.
Native apps are those developed in platform-specific languages (Java/Kotlin for Android, Swift/Objective-C for iOS). This is done for optimal performance and access to native device features (camera, GPS, etc.). Naturally, your testing here would focus on:
You’ll also have to run separate testing for each platform due to distinct codebases and UI elements. Plus, you should remember that if you’re working on a native app, you should deliver precisely what users expect from an Android or iOS product.
In an Android app, people value:
And for iOS apps, it’s:
These user preferences point to what areas of testing you ought to pay attention to.
Hybrid apps use web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript), wrapping them in a native container. Such a mix of seemingly contrary elements lets them run on multiple platforms with a single codebase.
Briefly, developers can write code once and apply it for different environments. That’s what makes them an easy choice for dev teams. But it also means that such products tend to perform slower, as they are not designed for a precise platform. Thus, they can’t fully harness a device’s powers.
Naturally, a hybrid app would need:
Also, as a hybrid project is essentially a combination of different platforms, it inherits a combination of their cons, too. So, first and foremost, you should prioritize fine security measures. It’ll protect your users, reputation, and revenue.
Native and hybrid app testing is rather straightforward. But progressive web apps come with a twist.
PWAs are, well, web applications. But they offer mobile-app-like features. Consider Pinterest. You can access it from your browser. Interact with saved content offline. Add the program’s icon to your home screen, etc. In other words, you can use all of Pinterest’s features without actually downloading the app itself.
How to perform mobile app testing on a PWA? It’s simple. You test like a web application, relying on browser developer tools and frameworks. But, of course, you need to consider how everything will run on a mobile device.
So, you need to validate:
You should also center your software testing services on PWA aspects that boost your business:
In other words, progressive web apps are known for the above benefits. And to secure them for your business, you ought to make sure your application supports them with its functionality.
When you’re considering how to test a mobile app, you should also think of its OS. As the eternal rivals, Android and iOS, come with some testing eccentricities.
Android is open-source in nature. It also has a much larger device fragmentation. This means you’ll need to test on a variety of devices with different screen sizes, resolutions, OS versions, and hardware specifications.
Apple’s closed ecosystem offers a more controlled environment. There’s a limited number of devices and stricter hardware and software variations. Thus, your testing can be more focused.
Android’s openness might lead to slight variations in how native features are implemented on different devices. So, you ought to secure proper behavior across various manufacturers.
Apple has stricter control over hardware and software. And it often leads to more consistent implementation of native features across iOS devices.
Google Play Store has a less stringent review process. On the one hand, you can add your product to the store easier. On the other hand, you’ll have tougher competition. So, you still ought to conduct fine testing to stand out.
The App Store has a more rigorous review process. Hence, higher app quality standards. For you, this translates to possibly longer development cycles and adjustments to the App Store’s requirements.
A wider range of testing tools and frameworks are available for Android (lots of open-source options, too).
Apple prefers you to rely on its tools. The most common variants are Xcode and XCTest.
Android can be more susceptible to security vulnerabilities. So, robust security testing is beyond important.
iOS apps typically boast of a more secure environment. But this can also lead to lax protection measures from some developers. Remember to never underestimate hackers. And adequately shield your project.
Overall, Android apps call for a more comprehensive testing strategy. But they also dominate the market. iOS applications always come second. Yet, also offer more reliability in terms of development and QA resources.
The answer to that question is simple. You test a product to see if it’s as good as you want it to be. And to make it better.
Testing helps uncover issues in your app. For example, if a user comes across a bug or a crash, that’s quite a problem for your project. But if a QA engineer uncovers them, now that’s an opportunity. Testing teams scan your app from all possible angles. The goal? To find potential troublemakers and fix them.
Especially if you lean into early testing, your crew will promptly locate defects, potential weak areas, and improvement vectors. In turn, this makes your product as refined and stable as possible as soon as possible. Further development will go smoother. And you can focus on advancing your app rather than correcting it.
You’ve most likely come across many posts akin to “how to do performance testing for mobile applications.” The reason for this topic being so widespread is the nature of mobile devices. Every smartphone user expects lightning-fast speeds. And if a page or service takes more than two to three seconds to load, half of visitors abandon it.
So, if your app can’t load fast enough, people won’t even get the chance to see what you offer. That’s why performance testing is so important. It gives your service the power of a positive first impression. And a continued reliable response.
These aspects directly impact UX. They drive you to optimize your app for different devices and network conditions. Thus allowing more people to enjoy your project.
Do you have a favorite dish? Do you get excited when someone asks you about it? It’s the same with mobile apps. If someone really likes your product, they’ll let the world know. And how do you make a person like your app? You make sure it’s just as great as you envisioned. With mobile QA.
It allows you to test mobile apps comprehensively. From minor bugs, like animation delays, to critical issues, like out-of-nowhere crashes – mobile app testing covers it all. It safeguards your project from negative reviews and encourages positive ones. Overall, it’s very fair. First, you work for quality. Then, it works for you.
Investing in mobile app testing might seem like an upfront cost. But it actually saves your money throughout the SDLC. Testing uncovers bugs before they reach app stores or users. Fixing these issues early in development is significantly cheaper than patching them up after release. Let’s consider a scenario:
Such a case undermines your image, strains your team, messes with your plans… And it just feels bad. So, to avoid all this chaos and pain, make sure you test an app properly and in a timely manner. As it will also reduce the need for post-release maintenance to address bugs reported by users.
A well-tested app provides a reliable and enjoyable user experience. This triggers a natural response in people: “I like this thing. I must have more of it.” In other words, good quality encourages new users to join and come back. Also, repeat customers tend to spend 67% more. So, you definitely want to do everything to “glue” consumers to your app.
Cyber threats are still the number one concern for businesses. Plus, users become more and more sensitive about their data. So, when we say cyber security is business security, we mean it. You don’t need to search hard to find out that companies keep getting hacked. User data keeps getting stolen. And many organizations’ reputation takes a hard blow after such incidents.
When you do security testing for mobile applications, you protect yourself from blackhats. You also:
As testing also ensures compliance with app store guidelines. Thus, you avoid legal issues and potential app removals.
A well-tested codebase aids future development and integration of new features. Briefly, it identifies and resolves:
And, logically, the more stable your app is now, the less you’ll have to work on it later. This proactive approach builds a strong foundation for scaling the app to accommodate a growing user base.
Also, you could choose to do automation testing for mobile applications. It’ll speed up your processes even further.
We’ve talked about this before. Today, a “fancy-schmancy” feature or an original UI is an attention grabber. Not something that entices people to stick with a product. Quality, on the other hand, can truly set you apart. Just imagine how users feel when wherever they go on your app, they’re met with swift responses, top-notch functions, clean interfaces, etc.
They’ll feel like you’ve made something specifically for them. They’ll treat your product like something special. Like something of their own. And QA engineers, especially manual QA specialists, let you focus on the users. They can run impeccable exploratory, usability, and accessibility testing. And they’ll make sure that your project succeeds through remarkable consumer experiences.
When we think about how to test an app, we also need to consider the intrinsic peculiarities of mobile devices. By that we mean that your testing should center on their distinctive features. As without those, a mobile application won’t be a mobile application as such.
And at the same time, these “special traits” are what make mobile QA so complex.
To be frank, what we’ve discussed above aren’t really challenges. They simply define the reality of mobile app testing. So, you shouldn’t view these aspects as something to avoid or try to overcome. You just need to accept them. Prepare for them. And resolve them.
Testing on real vs virtual devices is another buzzing topic. But it shouldn’t be. This discussion already has a clear answer. You can test on both, but real devices are always a priority.
Testing on real devices, from high-end flagships to budget options, provides the most realistic user experience. You can directly assess factors like:
Real-world testing also helps uncover unexpected issues like battery drain or overheating. However, there are drawbacks:
Virtual devices, like emulators and simulators, offer a faster and more controlled testing environment. They allow you to:
But testing with them also comes with some pitfalls:
The point is, testing solely on real or virtual devices is rarely a strategy QA teams choose. The optimal approach involves a strategic combination:
Use virtual devices for:
Rely on real devices for:
Now, let’s talk about tests that you can’t afford to miss. So, when you create a test plan for mobile application quality assessment, make these aspects the VIP guests and treat them like royalty.
Ensures the app’s core functionalities work as intended. It verifies features like login, search, payments, etc., function correctly under various scenarios. In other words, functional testing secures the features that define your app.
Evaluates the app’s frontend elements and user interaction for clarity, intuitiveness, and a visually appealing experience. One thing to note is that UI testing isn’t about making sure your app has the pretty privilege. It will investigate your project’s layouts, colors, fonts, etc., to see if everything is as it should be. But the point here is to supplement appearance with functional comfort:
Briefly, UI testing ensures that there’s something more behind a product’s captivating face.
As people say, communication is the key to a healthy relationship. And any mobile app has hundreds of relationships (links) between its parts. Integration testing checks how different components work together and exchange data. It trains various elements to be compatible. It teaches them to communicate properly so that no user is caught in a cross fire of dialogue-gone-wrong (like when an app can’t sync up with a payment system).
APIs act as communication protocols for your app’s modules. They explain how data is to be formatted, transmitted, received, etc. And without them, your product won’t know how to interact with external services.
For example, when you open the app, it might leverage an API from a restaurant listing service like Yelp or Google Maps. This API provides the app with information on nearby restaurants, including menus, ratings, and operating hours. So, API testing validates that your project knows how to exchange data and does it with no hiccups.
This assessment guarantees the app functions properly across diverse devices with ranging OSs, screen sizes, and hardware specifications. Whether your users rely on a Xiaomi that’s never been updated or a Google Pixel (a rare smartphone choice), compatibility testing helps provide pleasant experiences for any device and its environment.
Fortunately, accessibility testing is actively ditching its “niche” status. Such tests become more and more prevalent. As they help ensure users with disabilities (like visual impairments or motor limitations) can enjoy your product to the fullest. Accessibility testing focuses on checking how well an individual with different abilities can understand and utilize your app. It also prevents your business from getting into legal trouble and strengthens your brand position.
We’ve always been avid advocates for cyber security. And recently we’ve dedicated quite a few posts to it and even held a webinar for our clients. Among the top reasons for that is that in the first Q of 2024, there’s been a 30% increase in cyber attacks. But nearly 25% of companies underinvest in their security testing efforts.
And with people’s increased reliance on mobile devices, more and more blackhats chose mobile apps as their ideal targets. So, security testing should be among your priorities. Always.
Performance testing for mobile apps isn’t optional – it’s like a gym session for your product. By simulating real-world use with varying loads and conditions, you identify weaknesses that cause lags, crashes, or battery drain. This ensures a smooth, responsive experience for users, keeps them engaged, and avoids the frustration of a slow app that gobbles up battery life.
L10n is often equated to just translation. But localization is not just texts. It’s also:
Localization testing means making your app feel natural and welcoming for target audiences. And while a big part of it is indeed translation, the most important part is fully adapting your product to a different user pool. L10n is quite a challenging task. But it’s impossible to overestimate its impact on your business’ success.
Mobile devices are all about comfort. And if your app doesn’t deliver on that front, people will leave. But they will also tell everyone about their “horrible, inhumane experience.”
Usability testing helps you find a different perspective on your product. Sure, it can be functionally perfect. Yet, is it enjoyable for actual people? This testing observes users interacting with your app to identify areas of confusion, difficulty, or inefficiency in completing tasks. In other words, QA engineers put on users’ shoes and walk all around your app in them to see how it really feels.
Usability testing also promotes user-centricity. And making an app with its users in mind is something not everyone sees as valuable (a big mistake, if you ask us).
Involves QA specialists exploring the app without following pre-written checklists. It also involves using the app unconventionally to uncover hidden bugs or obscure issues. Exploratory testing allows your team to prepare for less-than-ideal and insanely weird scenarios. It also lets you refine your product in unthinkable ways (it’s not a bug, it’s a feature).
Mobile app testing is complex. It’s also very intricate. And you can’t really know how your bug fixing or update went until you check them in unity with everything else. Regression testing focuses on the reruns of critical test cases after implementing new features or amendments. Briefly, it helps ensure previous functionalities haven’t been broken by the changes.
Verifies that the app meets the predefined acceptance criteria set by stakeholders (e.g., clients, business users). In essence, it centers on assessing to what degree your product satisfies the business and consumers. So, acceptance testing is like looking at what’s been done and comparing it to the initial blueprint.
Mobile apps present unique functionalities that require special testing considerations. These particular features need your attention precisely because they are what sets apart a mobile app from other kinds of applications.
Verify the app installs smoothly on various devices with different OS and storage capacities. Ensure the installation process is clear, user-friendly, and runs without errors. Also, test uninstallation to ensure all app data and files are removed cleanly.
Since mobile apps rely on touch gestures for interaction, testing ensures gestures like taps, swipes, pinches, and multi-touch are recognized accurately. Test gestures on devices with varying screen sizes and responsiveness.
Mobile apps often rely on internet connectivity for core functionalities. Test how the app behaves under different network conditions (weak Wi-Fi, cellular data with varying speeds) and network outages. Verify the app gracefully handles connection drops and retries actions when connectivity is restored.
Mobile users frequently switch between apps or receive calls/notifications. Test how the app handles interruptions, saves data (e.g., draft messages), and resumes functioning when brought back to the foreground.
If your app utilizes location services (e.g., maps, navigation), test how accurately it retrieves and displays user location data. Verify location permissions are requested appropriately, and that the app functions as intended with or without location services enabled.
Test how the app utilizes battery, memory, processing power, etc. Monitor battery drain under various usage scenarios and identify areas for optimization to ensure the app doesn’t drain the battery excessively. Additionally, test memory usage to avoid crashes or performance issues due to excessive consumption.
Not all apps require constant internet connectivity. Test how the app behaves in offline scenarios. Ensure core functionalities that don’t require internet (e.g., accessing local data) still work as expected. If the app offers limited offline functionality, verify users are clearly informed about these restrictions.
This part might seem a bit boring. But boring stuff is important, too. The greatest stories in history were written with hundreds of drafts, notes, and reviews. And for your project to have smooth sailing, you need records of everything that will happen.
Documentation is your map to a treasure. It’s your way back to checkpoints if something goes wrong. It’s a manual every team member can rely on. It’s certainly not the most fun bit about mobile app testing. But have you ever seen a project go well without it?
After you’re done with the documentation that describes how to test an app, you ought to organize your testing process in practice. We don’t believe in “universal solutions.” As even automated testing, something most consider a “tremendous value” for any case, you can apply in countless ways (or not implement it at all – yes, sometimes it’s for the better).
This outline of a testing process is not a strict guideline for you. But you can use it as a foundation and adapt it to your project specifics.
Software testers thoroughly examine the app’s functionalities, features, and target audience. This might involve reviewing the SRS and user stories. Understanding the app’s purpose and functionalities allows your team to develop a comprehensive testing strategy and create relevant test cases.
QA experts define the types of testing to be performed (functional, performance, etc.), tools required, and the overall testing scope based on project needs and resources. A well-defined strategy ensures all aspects of the app are checked properly, resource allocation is optimized, and the testing process aligns with project goals.
Next, your team will develop detailed instructions for testing specific functionalities, user interactions, and scenarios. Each test case should include expected results.
After, they will set up a testing environment that mimics the production environment and create test data that reflects real-world usage patterns. A realistic testing environment helps identify issues that might occur in the real world. And using diverse test data ensures the app functions correctly under various scenarios.
QA professionals manually or through automation tools execute the defined test cases, documenting any bugs or deviations.
Finally, your team will document encountered bugs, including steps to reproduce the issue, expected behavior, and impact on the app. Developers then analyze and fix the reported issues.
After bug fixes are implemented, QA engineers rerun the affected test cases (retesting) and potentially a broader set of tests (regression testing). These procedures verify that bug fixes were successful and no new problems popped up.
In Agile development methodologies, where frequent releases are the norm, a minimal level of testing might be conducted in a pre-production environment. But a quick check after deployment helps catch any critical issues that might have slipped through the cracks.
Agile emphasizes continuous improvement. Thus, repeating the testing cycle with each iteration ensures new features function as intended and the overall app quality remains high.
Test automation allows for faster test execution. It also frees up testers to focus on more complex scenarios that require human judgment. So, it’s recommended to automate at least a portion of your tasks, like repetitive test cases. You’ll be able to save time, resources, and your team’s high spirits.
QA engineers will analyze where automation is valuable. Pick test cases, write automation scripts, and if you wish, help you maintain them.
As the app’s complexity or testing scope grows, it might be necessary to expand the testing team or leverage external expertise. You don’t want your crews struggling. And you don’t want your product’s quality to dwindle.
So, you can turn to a QA company to help you scale the team. It will not only supply your project with experienced professionals, but also help manage the newcomers, including their:
Automated testing (AT) is a madly complicated topic. You can explore it in detail in our blog posts. But for now, let us focus on AT for mobile apps. Specifically, we’ll overview the core concepts and practices a fine product will need.
We always say that you can’t automate at random. It’s important to not get carried away. Because when you automate too much, you lose the benefits of the human touch. And if you automate too little, you might just end up compromising quality and burning out your team in no time.
Automated testing for mobile apps is all about balance. That’s why you should always apply it gradually. So, begin by automating the following.
A well-defined testing process forms the foundation for successful automation. Otherwise it would be like… what do they say? Shooting in the dark? No. It would be like fighting five sharks with a pocket knife, while fully submerged in water. With your leg and arm tied up.
As a QA company, we know the value of precise planning. And we welcome you to gather insights from our practice.
Overall, setting up automation isn’t too difficult. That is if you have seasoned specialists on your team. Now that would be like hunting a sunfish (one of the slowest in the world) with your own trained sharks – an easy catch.
You might be tempted to automate more and more as you go. We see it quite often. But AT may not be needed or really valuable for your project. You’d just be wasting resources and crushing your expectations for the wondrous benefits of automation.
Instead, consider the alternative – general testing. It isn’t a specific type of test, but rather a broad category encompassing various activities performed throughout the SDLC. General testing doesn’t prefer manual or automated testing. It only applies them where each is needed most. It only applies them in a way that’s worthwhile for your project.
Planning and preparation for general testing might take a while longer. But this extra time for data gathering and analysis is what lets you implement precise techniques where they’re really of value.
When it comes to automated testing tools, there’re lots of options.
But having plenty to choose from is actually what makes selecting your tool so difficult. You might be inclined to pick software that has good reviews, recommendations, or popularity. While these aspects are indeed important, nothing beats matching a tool’s capabilities to your exact needs.
So, instead of recommending what to pick, let’s focus on how you can find an option that fits your product.
Here are a few tips from our QA crew on how to test a mobile app.
Building a high-performing mobile app testing team is… not easy. No matter what anyone tells you, finding the right people for any project is arguably a more taxing task than testing itself. And that comes from a QA company with over a decade of experience.
We won’t sugarcoat it for you. Because you need to be prepared for the challenges ahead to handle them gracefully. So, don’t be nervous about it. Instead arm yourself with all the needed data and resources to build your dream team. That’s the first and most influential aspect for your project’s quality.
Manual QA engineers provide a human touch to testing, uncovering issues that might be missed by automation. They are also adept at exploratory testing, where they creatively explore the app to discover unexpected problems.
Make sure the candidates you pick for this position are proficient at:
Pay attention to soft skills as well:
Automated QA engineers specialize in creating and maintaining automated scripts using testing frameworks and tools. Their goal is to streamline the testing process. Here’re skills you should look for in such a specialist:
General QA engineers possess a well-rounded skillset. They can adapt to various testing needs throughout the development lifecycle. These specialists offer flexibility within the testing team, and are able to handle both manual and automated testing tasks as needed. They can also play a valuable role in knowledge sharing and training within the team.
A QA lead provides direction and leadership for the entire testing team. They oversee the testing strategy, manage resources, and ensure alignment with project objectives. They also act as a liaison between testers, developers, and other stakeholders.
Since a QA lead acts as a guide for your crew, they should possess knowledge that helps every member. As if you tell someone to do something without ever having done it yourself… Well, you get the idea. These experts should have in-depth knowledge and experience with:
Last but not least (actually, very far from the least), a QA lead needs to have impeccable communication skills. They will be continuously telling people what to do, to put it bluntly, tracing their performance, and exchanging information with everyone involved.
Now, please don’t think that you must have every specialist described above to develop a deserving product. Not at all. You might be just fine with a minimal number of professionals. It all depends on the size and complexity of your project. And, of course, the resources available.
The only thing you absolutely need is good, skilled people on your side.
Now, if you need help with finding those good, skilled people, a testing company might be a good bet. The biggest pro of working with a QA vendor is that they have readily available specialists and vetted talent pools. So, building your dream team will be much easier and faster.
But, as with all good things, there’s a catch. Selecting a company that can provide you with all you need is tricky.
Also, another thing that isn’t brought up often enough. Ensure that your QA partner has robust data security practices in place. To protect your app’s confidential information during testing, make sure you discuss and sign the necessary documents.
And if your provider is even in the slightest reluctant about this – look for someone else. Focus on what you need. Not what a vendor isn’t ready to provide for you.
Life is about enjoying the present moment. It’s some good advice. But not for software development. Businesses need to incessantly look out for new opportunities and threats. They need to constantly locate something to set them apart and protect them from any potential holdbacks.
So, to finish up this guide, we also need to take a peek into the future of mobile app testing.
Artificial intelligence had many ups and downs. It went from users hating it to obsessing over it. In fact, these fluctuations are still ongoing. And that’s normal for evolving tech. But even with all that, AI has shown tremendous promise. For testing, it can be used for:
In short, you can see why even those who don’t actively use AI still keep a close eye on it.
As artificial intelligence’s use for software testing refines itself in the coming years, we’ll see a much more active engagement of it in the industry. The only thing we worry about is that it may follow a path similar to that of AT.
The automation paradox is a dangerous thing. Briefly, upon learning how beneficial automated testing was, businesses flocked to it. They began to automate left and right in hopes of multiplying AT’s advantages. But what they ended up with was subpar quality, wasted money, and lost talents.
The potential of AI is vast. So is the potential for mistakes with its use. We can’t see into the future. But we can learn from the past. And what we recommend is relying on AI in two cases:
Overall, businesses should tread lightly to not end up in a financial ditch with reputation lost to hasty AI initiatives.
The role of manual QA testers is evolving. Non-stop, in fact. And given what we’ve seen so far, we can confidently say more companies will rely on general testing as their main approach. Repetitive tasks will be increasingly automated, but human expertise will remain crucial. Manual testers will transition to a more specialized QA role, focusing on:
At the moment, there’s a clear divide between manual and automated experts. What general testing does is uniting them for the greater good – quality. And as AT will become more and more prevalent, manual QA specialists will have more targeted functions within a team.
We’ve talked quite a bit about the concept of quality engineering. Mainly because we’re really excited about this next step in the evolution of QA. But also because we know how it will transform the approach to software development.
Briefly, QE differs from QA in one major way – it’s much closely tied to the development and business processes (rather than being mostly associated with testing only).
As of now, QE is being slowly implemented by some companies. Mostly because there’s still no unified definition of quality engineering and the roles for related positions. But from our experience, these specialists will have a much broader task pool:
Overall, QE is a much needed upgrade to the role of a QA expert.
This shift you can consider an extension of QE. As quality assurance engineers become intertwined with business processes more and more, they’ll have to adapt to their new-found impact. They will focus not on just testing aspects, but on how what they do drives your company’s goals.
Traditionally, mobile app testing primarily concentrated on technical aspects:
But within business assurance, QA specialists move past these core functionalities. They center on delivering value to the users and your business.
Thus, QA engineers become more involved in the non-technical side of their work. They will:
This holistic approach ensures mobile app testing isn’t just a cost center, but a strategic investment that drives business growth and user satisfaction.
As automated tools develop and mature, they’ll be able to cover more and more QA tasks.
But QE lifecycle automation isn’t about replacing human professionals. It’s about allowing them to level-up, in a way. AT will handle the heavy lifting. Like dealing with countless, repetitive tests or breaking down complex scenarios into manageable portions. And people will focus on creative problem-solving, strategic test planning, and ensuring the app delivers visionary UX.
With AI and automation, many fear that a person’s effort won’t be needed anymore. But let’s look at the issue this way.
Both AI and humans have a long way to go. And as artificial intelligence advances, so will we. Some shifts and hardships are inevitable. But change is a constant in our personal and professional lives. So, as long as we continue to progress, AI, AT, or anything else won’t be able to outrun us.
And after all, it’s people who created these unthinkable tools in the first place.
And there you have it. That’s all you have to know about how to test mobile apps. Summed up, of course. To go into fine detail would mean writing an insanely voluminous book. In multiple chapters, too. That’s just how complex the topic and task of mobile app testing is.
So, maybe you could just hire a QA company to do it for you 😉
Quality control is obsolete. The spread of Agile, DevOps, and shift-left approach has pushed traditional…
Be honest, if your phone disappeared right now, your world would be in shambles. Data…
Teams have a love-hate relationship with Android. It’s highly customizable and has an incredibly vast…
Apple applications are easy to test. Compared to Android, that is. But when it comes…
Result-driven QA isn’t always about planning and strategizing. Sometimes, the best thing for your product…
A flimsy UI doesn’t lead to customer frustration, negative reviews, and high churn. When people…