As soon as developers get ready-tested software pieces, they introduce the required changes. Often, any additions the software system develop new defects. But there’s a solution: regression testing service. It can be a part of manual QA testing services or a part of test automation.
The purpose of regression testing is to catch the accidentally introduced bugs and to ensure that previously eliminated defects aren`t creatable. In such a way, regression testing ensures that code changes don’t impact the existing program features. It has to be performed every time the developers modify a software component or a feature.
Software regression testing increases chances to detect bugs after the introduced changes. It facilitates research of undesirable side effects that resulted after new operating environment implementation. The test also deals with bugs: it finds early-stage and ingrained errors as well as ensures that old bugs won`t harm the system. As a result, testing improves product quality.
The test is required when new software features are introduced. Also, it is necessary to conduct when developers fix bugs or modified product code.
An effective regression test can be carried out via the following list of techniques:
With the addition of new functionalities, the scope of regression testing will keep increasing. An effective strategy calls for careful planning and prioritization. We’d recommend starting with the following steps.
Pay attention to the fifth point of a plan. When it comes to prioritization of the test case, it makes sense to arrange them in a way to maximize early fault detection. You can select your test cases based on the following criteria:
QA specialists may perform regression testing manually, although it is time-consuming. By contrast, automation tools save 60% of the time to run the test and reduce 40% of money wastes. Here are a few notorious and well-established regression testing tools:
For many, regression testing often means retesting the existing software features. These testing types require different approaches and set different goals. The purpose of regression testing is to detect the software system side effects resulted from any code modifications. Unlike retesting, regression checks for unexpected defects. By contrast, retesting confirms if the tests cases broken in the final execution work correctly. It deals with the original fault of tests cases. QA engineers do retesting by defect fix, while regression doesn`t deal with the bug verification.
Moreover, regression can be automated and carried out parallel with retesting. Retesting cannot be automated. It executes a defect with different inputs and a new build, although data and environment remain the same. It is always of higher priority in the software strategy plan. However, regression doesn`t cover the whole software; only modified parts undergo testing.
Regression testing is an integral stage of the quality assurance process. An effective regression QA strategy with automation at its core prevents unexpected bug damages and saves the projects from going over budget.
Regression testing takes place at the end of every iteration, and that makes it a perfect candidate for automation. Since we need to check at least the core functionality after even minor code changes, the regression test suite will be highly repetitive. If a product is dynamic and frequently updated with new features, it means that you have stable functionality to automate and manual regression testing cases to use as the basis.
What are the benefits of automated regression testing?
At the start of automated regression testing, QA engineers write autotests on existing test cases covering the main functionality of the software/application. Then, the QA team runs tests within a specific time interval. Also, they conduct the tests each time a new build is created or updated. The final stage includes a full-scale result analysis.
In the end, knowledge really is power when it comes to regression testing. By keeping bugs in your sights, they’re less likely to take you by surprise. When a known bug shows up after changes, you’ll have a clue on how to handle it quickly and effectively. Without regression testing, you’ll be left scratching your head, trying to remember what exactly it was that caused this the last time.
Read more about Regression Testing:
Regression Testing Service
Tools for Regression Testing: 2020 Overview
Regression, Smoke and Sanity Testing – What’s the Difference?
Quality control is obsolete. The spread of Agile, DevOps, and shift-left approach has pushed traditional…
Be honest, if your phone disappeared right now, your world would be in shambles. Data…
Teams have a love-hate relationship with Android. It’s highly customizable and has an incredibly vast…
Apple applications are easy to test. Compared to Android, that is. But when it comes…
Result-driven QA isn’t always about planning and strategizing. Sometimes, the best thing for your product…
A flimsy UI doesn’t lead to customer frustration, negative reviews, and high churn. When people…